<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun restricting access to SunSolve and the System Handbook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sunhelp.org/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sunhelp.org/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/</link>
	<description>News and information about Sun Microsystems hardware and software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: (e)Mail Insecurity</title>
		<link>http://www.sunhelp.org/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>(e)Mail Insecurity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunhelp.org/archives/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/#comment-812</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The demise of SunSolve as we know it&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The demise of SunSolve as we know it</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael C. Vergallen</title>
		<link>http://www.sunhelp.org/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael C. Vergallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunhelp.org/archives/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/#comment-796</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;ve had contact with someone from sun who&#039;s actually told me that the documentation to older systems &amp; EOL systems will remain the same. However the new systems will require a support contract in future ... In a way one should not take the original posting with a bit of salt. Now what I suspect is that SUN&#039;s documentation devision is not as profitable as it ones was and that is the reaseon they are charging again for access to the documentation.

NOTE : This is my opinion and has not been verified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had contact with someone from sun who&#8217;s actually told me that the documentation to older systems &amp; EOL systems will remain the same. However the new systems will require a support contract in future &#8230; In a way one should not take the original posting with a bit of salt. Now what I suspect is that SUN&#8217;s documentation devision is not as profitable as it ones was and that is the reaseon they are charging again for access to the documentation.</p>
<p>NOTE : This is my opinion and has not been verified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Prazak</title>
		<link>http://www.sunhelp.org/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Prazak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 03:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunhelp.org/archives/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/#comment-720</guid>
		<description>The end result will be a greater incentive for small customers to buy EOL hardware second-hand or to buy non-Sun x86 systems, and it is up to Sun to decide wether this market segment matters to them.
I agree that this is generally the opposite direction they should go, but I am not responsible for their profitability, either.  We should note, however, that even Red Hat faces a similar dillema with RHEL, where money has to come from somewhere.  With RHEL, free clones were made, so with SunSolve, perhaps the response would be to run OpenSolaris on non-Sun x86 hardware.  It&#039;s hard to say what the final impact of this whould be...but some indications show Red Hat slipping a bit, recently.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end result will be a greater incentive for small customers to buy EOL hardware second-hand or to buy non-Sun x86 systems, and it is up to Sun to decide wether this market segment matters to them.<br />
I agree that this is generally the opposite direction they should go, but I am not responsible for their profitability, either.  We should note, however, that even Red Hat faces a similar dillema with RHEL, where money has to come from somewhere.  With RHEL, free clones were made, so with SunSolve, perhaps the response would be to run OpenSolaris on non-Sun x86 hardware.  It&#8217;s hard to say what the final impact of this whould be&#8230;but some indications show Red Hat slipping a bit, recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin L. Ganger</title>
		<link>http://www.sunhelp.org/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/comment-page-1/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin L. Ganger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunhelp.org/archives/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/#comment-697</guid>
		<description>Whether or not the changes are smaller than we think, the fact is that Sun is going in the opposite direction than they need to go, especially now that they&#039;re making Solaris 10 open source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not the changes are smaller than we think, the fact is that Sun is going in the opposite direction than they need to go, especially now that they&#8217;re making Solaris 10 open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Prazak</title>
		<link>http://www.sunhelp.org/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Prazak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 02:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunhelp.org/archives/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>I wrote SunSolve asking about this, and they said that documentation for EOL hardware will still be avavailable for free under the &quot;Archived SunSolve content.&quot;  The effect of the changes will be less than I initially thought, although it might affect people needing information on Sun&#039;s newer hardware.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote SunSolve asking about this, and they said that documentation for EOL hardware will still be avavailable for free under the &#8220;Archived SunSolve content.&#8221;  The effect of the changes will be less than I initially thought, although it might affect people needing information on Sun&#8217;s newer hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mg midget</title>
		<link>http://www.sunhelp.org/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>mg midget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunhelp.org/archives/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>i hope, there will a lot of unofficial sources on the web then. maybe they realise
afterwards, that they will lose customers by restricting their offers.

Hse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope, there will a lot of unofficial sources on the web then. maybe they realise<br />
afterwards, that they will lose customers by restricting their offers.</p>
<p>Hse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.sunhelp.org/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunhelp.org/archives/2005/03/13/sun-restricting-access-to-sunsolve-and-the-system-handbook/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve sent my comments about this to Sun. I hope many others do so too, and maybe they&#039;ll realise that restricting access to systems documentation isn&#039;t the best of ideas....

Funny though, they preach openness but close their own documentation sources... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve sent my comments about this to Sun. I hope many others do so too, and maybe they&#8217;ll realise that restricting access to systems documentation isn&#8217;t the best of ideas&#8230;.</p>
<p>Funny though, they preach openness but close their own documentation sources&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
